Separating Proteins by pI-Values - Can 2D LC Replace 2D GE?
This Month's Feature
Separating Proteins by pI-Values - Can 2D LC Replace 2D GE? (continued)
Alternatives to 2D GE
Depending on the type of sample and the amount of protein available,
there are at least two main alternative routes. With plenty of sample
at hand, off-line separations are simpler and often an advantage as the
first dimension. Isoelectric focusing can separate proteins according
to pI values and has many advantages as a prefractionation technique
(7). However, with very limited sample amounts, on-line techniques
allow transfer of the whole fraction to the second dimension, and with
miniaturized columns, little band broadening is obtained.
Unfortunately, isoelectric focusing is not easily included in an
on-line 2D instrumentation with microbore columns.
In samples containing relatively few proteins, the "shotgun" approach
is an alternative, by enzymatic degradation of the mixture of proteins
to peptides and coupled LC–MS-MS or MALDI-TOF MS analyses of the
peptide mixtures for protein identification. Even with some overlap of
peptides, the protein databases have the potential of identifying the
majority of the proteins, depending upon the concentration.
Samples containing more complex sources of proteins always benefit from
a preseparation of the proteins prior to enzymatic degradation, either
in one dimension or in two dimensions. With a 2D system, the two
separation principles should be orthogonal, such as a combination of pI
separation and reversed-phase chromatography or hydrophobic interaction
chromatography. For peptides, a combination of cation exchange and
reversed phase is common today.
The separation of proteins on cation exchangers with salt gradients has
some disadvantages; foremost that there is no direct relationship
between the pI and the salt concentration and the retention time.
Eluting proteins by a pH gradient would be much more advantageous,
because the pH of each eluting peak in principle can be measured
directly, resulting in a direct link between eluting pH and pI of the
proteins. Unfortunately, common pH gradients always have been known for
low repeatability and nonlinearity.
Thus, an important question is whether a separation according to pI can
be implemented as the first dimension of a 2D LC separation.
Separations According to pI In the late 1970s, Sluyterman and colleagues (8,9) described a
pH-gradient ion exchange chromatography (IEC) method that used the
buffering capacity of the column to generate linear outlet pH-gradients
without external mixing of the buffers, which they termed
chromatofocusing (CF). CF is most commonly performed by titration of a
weak anion-exchange column, (e.g.,
DEAE(diethylaminoethyl)-functionalized cellulose), which initially has
been equilibrated with a start buffer at a pH higher than the pI of the
most basic proteins, and is eluted with a buffer of low pH. To obtain
as linear pH-gradients as possible, and larger peak capacity, the
buffers usually contain mixtures of polyampholytes with different pKa
values to get an even buffering capacity over the chosen pH range.
However, CF has several limitations; limited reproducibility because of
batch-to-batch variability in the chemical composition of polyampholyte
mixtures, formation of association complexes with proteins (10), high
background absorption with UV detection, and little flexibility in
choice of buffer concentrations.
While CF generally exploits the buffering capacity of the ion exchanger
to obtain a retained intracolumn pH-gradient, the opposite is true for
pH-gradient ion exchange. Liu and Anderson (11) and Shan and Anderson
(12) used pH-gradient ion exchange chromatography (IEC), which they
termed gradient CF, to overcome many of the shortcomings of CF. They
used ion-exchange materials with small buffering capacities in the
applied pH range in combination with buffer components that are not
adsorbed on the ion-exchange column, (e.g., amine buffering species on
anion-exchange materials). Under such conditions, the contribution from
the column itself to the delay of the pH-gradient is minimal.
Consequently, the outlet pH-gradient will roughly reflect the pump
gradient settings, which gives enhanced flexibility in controlling the
slope of the pH-gradient (11,12). In contrast to CF, pH-gradient IEC
also allows the use of higher buffer concentrations without affecting
the slope of the pH-gradient. Accordingly, improved chromatographic
performance can be obtained with only a few common buffer components,
while still attaining the characteristic focusing effect of the protein
bands.
Recently, Andersen and colleagues developed a pI separation of proteins
on packed capillary columns using a strong anion exchanger, which
improved the peak shape of the proteins while maintaining the focusing
effect (Figure 1) (13). In the weakly basic to acidic pH range, a
linear pH curve was obtained (Figure 2), which could be used to
determine b-lactoglobulins in skimmed milk (Figure 3).
The pH monitoring was performed by a flow-through cell with a pH
electrode (13). Unfortunately, the cell was not sufficiently robust in
the long run. Another smaller electrode was built into a housing for
microlitre flow but the response time of the pH electrode was much too
long. Thus, we decided that a larger volume pH electrode was needed in
order to give fast response, requiring 1–2 mm i.d. ion exchange columns
in order to avoid too much peak broadening.
It is a basic fact of this kind of pH gradients that a linear pH curve
is obtained only in a range outside the buffering area of the ion
exchanger. Thus, starting with strongly basic pH led to a nonlinear pH
curve because of titration of the ion exchanger. This is, however, not
necessarily a problem, as long as it is reproducible (Figure 4). A
mixture of acidic and basic proteins in a wide range of pI values could
be separated easily in two groups by a wide range pH gradient (Figure
5).
In order to avoid precipitation of hydrophobic proteins at their pI
values and to reduce potential losses by adsorption, trifluoroethanol
(14) was added to the mobile phase in 2–20%, but with disastrous
results. The peak shape of the proteins was strongly malformed with
strong peak broadening. Replacing trifluoroethanol with ethanol,
however, gave more symmetric and narrow peak shapes. The addition of
20% or more of ethanol dehydrated the pH electrode, but 10% could be
used without problems, as shown in Figure 5. (continued)